“And not only so, but also when Rebecca had conceived children by one man, our forefather Isaac, though they were not yet born and had done nothing either good or bad–in order that God’s purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of his call– she was told, “The older will serve the younger.” As it is written, ‘Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.’” (Romans 9:10-13)
As we continue on this subject of Unconditional Election, we have here in the letter to the Romans the clearest example of what it means to when it is said that God’s election is unconditional.
“Though they were not yet born and had done nothing either good or bad”, God’s call on Jacob over Esau was not based on anything that either had done or upon any qualities one possessed over the other. Jacob and Esau had not even been born yet, they had done nothing either good or evil, nothing that would either qualify or disqualify them from God’s favor. Neither even had the possession of birthright in which to rely upon, in fact God goes against conventional protocol by blessing the younger over the older, but this also is a repeated theme throughout scripture as well (i.e. Ishmael and Isaac, Ephriam and Manasseh, etc.)
The purpose of God’s choosing Jacob over Esau was that “God’s purpose of election might continue”. This means that God is sovereign (in control) over the salvation of man; “might continue” means that God has been choosing from the beginning and that it will continue to be that way. This choosing is by grace:
“For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast.” (Ephesians 2:8-9)
This choosing was also done before the creation of the world:
“…he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him. In love he predestined us for adoption through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will” (Ephesians 1:4-5)